Home
Israel doesn't want to negotiate, Antonio Guterres says
Israel doesn't want to negotiate, Antonio Guterres says in exclusive interview
By Ibtisam Azem, The New Arab
NEW YORK, 22 Sept. - (ANA) - In an exclusive interview with The New Arab's sister site Al-Araby al-Jadeed, United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, addressed several challenges facing the world, including the recent Israeli attack against Qatar, Palestine, and the situation in Syria and Lebanon.
The interview was conducted by Ibtisam Azem, Al-Araby al-Jadeed’s senior correspondent at the UN in New York.
This interview has been slightly edited for brevity and clarity.
Q: The State of Qatar was attacked on 9 September, after a series of other attacks on other countries in the region. How do you explain the precedent of launching an attack on a country that is mediating to end a war it is waging?
UN Secretary General António Guterres (AG): I think it's a unique case in recent history that a country (Israel) bombards six other countries on the same day. There was the bombardment of the Palestinians in Gaza, bombardment in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and, apparently, there were two drone attacks in Tunisia and Qatar.
The attack on Qatar in particular represents an unacceptable violation of the territorial integrity of the country. Qatar has done a fantastic job in trying to create the conditions, not only for a ceasefire in Gaza, but for the release of the hostages. So it is inconceivable that a strike is carried out on Qatar, violating its territorial integrity and killing at least six people on its soil.
I think that this strike demonstrates that the Israeli government really doesn’t want to negotiate. Unfortunately, we have reasons to be very concerned that the horrendous suffering of the Palestinian people in Gaza will go on, and the destruction of Gaza City with all its consequences will go on.
We also have reasons to believe that essential humanitarian aid will be unable to support the Palestinian people, who are suffering from famine and from the total absence of minimum healthcare, due to Israeli restrictions.
It is all of these issues combined that make the level of death and destruction in Gaza the highest number in my mandate as a Secretary-General.
Q: On Monday, the conference on the two-state solution will take place after the UNGA adopted a resolution supporting the NY declaration last week. Some would say it's too little too late. Looking at the facts that Israel created on the ground, is it impossible to create a viable and contiguous Palestinian state?
AG: I would say that it's never too late to do the right thing, and I've been fighting with the instruments I have, which of course are limited, using at least my voice. I've been fighting for the two-state solution for several decades.
For a very simple reason, there is no alternative to the two-state solution. The idea of a one-state solution, in which Palestinians would be expelled, by which the Palestinians would be forced to leave under occupation, discrimination, is something inconceivable in the 21st century. And it would mean that there would be no peace in the Middle East, and it would mean a dramatic increase in radicalisation in many parts of the world.
So the problem is not that the two-state solution is difficult; the problem is that the one-state solution is intolerable, and so we must do everything we can to mobilise the international community and apply as much pressure as possible to make sure that there are no attempts to neutralise the two-state solution.
An example is the recent decision of increasing settlements and the E1 project; we must make all possible efforts to keep the two-state solution alive at the present moment and to create the conditions for its effective implementation as soon as possible.
Q: I would like to push back here a little bit, because as a matter of fact, we do have a one-state reality, which is an apartheid state. We have four sets of Israeli laws that apply differently to different Palestinians depending on where they live (in their historic homeland in Jerusalem, the West Bank, Palestinian citizens of Israel, and Gaza), while we have one set of laws that applies to Israeli Jews no matter where they live. So why not fight for a one-state solution, democratic for all, instead of a two-state solution that is impossible because of the reality Israel created on the ground?
AG: From a democratic point of view, I would have no problems with that. But I don't think that the Israelis would ever accept that situation. I think it would be easier for them to accept a two-state solution in which they can live in peace and security with the Palestinians with equivalent rights.
Q: But they are not accepting that…
SG: Not at the present moment…
Q: What would make them accept the two-state solution at the present moment?
AG. Well, I think we need to continue putting pressure in all possible forms and make them understand that the only way for them to have real peace is if they grant the Palestinian people the satisfaction of their right to self-determination.
Q: A UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, found that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. What are your comments on this?
AG: I think that it is something that the Israeli authorities should look into very carefully. Our position has always been very clear. It is not for the Secretary-General to make the legal determination of genocide.
But independently of the name, I think what matters is the reality. And the reality is horrendous, absolutely intolerable, in which we are seeing the collective punishment of the Palestinian people for acts of Hamas that were totally condemnable, but they do not justify at all this level of death and destruction.
This is morally, politically, and legally intolerable.
Q: Following up on the word "morally," you also have an ethical or moral obligation- it will mean a great deal for a lot of people, especially the Palestinians in Gaza, if the Secretary-General also says "I can see that there is a genocide happening."
AG: What I've seen and what I say is that it is so clear and so tough that the problem is not the problem of words; the problem is the problem of a reality that we need to eliminate.
Q: And how do you want to eliminate it? Israel has impunity…
AG: We are doing what we can on all fronts for that purpose, and we should never lose hope. I don’t have an army. I don’t have the power to solve these problems, but I have a clear determination to solve these problems. I can guarantee that this is a central objective in the exercise of my mandate.
Q: Do you think that powerful states are not doing what they should to stop Israel?
AG: I think it is clear that Israel will only stop if there is pressure from the United States, and I believe, I hope, that the United States will understand that it is in the interest of peace and security around the world to tell Israel that they must abide by international law.
Q: What about European states that also have a lot of power?
AG: The same applies to all other countries in the world. I think it's important that they are clear about Israel that this is unacceptable.
Q: Do you think they should stop delivering weapons?
AG: There are many ways to express that. In my opinion, the pressure must be as effective as possible.
Q: What are your comments on the American veto at the UNSC on Thursday, against a resolution that called for a ceasefire and immediate entry of aid?
AG: I think we have a problem of legitimacy and effectiveness of the Security Council. It doesn't correspond anymore to what the world was in 1945. We need a Security Council in which the representation is equivalent to what the world is today. It's intolerable that Africa has no permanent seat at the SC and the same for Latin America, and there is a clear disequilibrium in the composition that reflects the end of the Second World War, with some small adjustments that were made in between.
On the other hand, the Security Council has been paralysed by the geopolitical divides and its inefficiency in addressing the key crises that we have in the world. It's not only the Gaza crisis, but the same in Ukraine and other places. This is something that makes it clear that the reform at the Security Council must be one of the important objectives of the international community.
Q: And what are your comments on yet another American veto?
AG: All vetoes that do not allow the Security Council to act in the right direction are something that is very negative and doesn't help the image of the Security Council and the image of the United Nations.
I believe that there is no solution for the problems of the world without a strong multilateral engagement.
Q: Your special envoy to Syria, Geir O. Pedersen, resigned on Thursday. This comes at a time when Syria is facing many challenges, which would make the UN job more difficult, no?
AG: I have an enormous admiration for the work that Geir Pedersen has been doing, always at the service of the Syrian people, without any other agenda but the well-being of the Syrian people and peace and unity in Syria.
But I believe that this is the moment in which we need to intensify our approach in Syria. We need to move our mission right-sized to Damascus.
I understand that Mr. Pedersen, who has been working for so many years, has decided that he should let someone new come. But I can guarantee that we will maintain the same commitment to support the Syrian people.
Q: You will be meeting the Syrian president next week during UNGA high-level meetings. Could you comment on the challenges you are seeing that the country is facing and where to go from here?
AG: Syria, for me, is a matter of heart. I worked in Syria as a United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and I saw the enormous generosity of the Syrian people in welcoming the Iraqis. There were no refugee camps, and they shared everything with them. To see the Syrian people suffer, as I've seen since the repression that Assad started, and then its massive outflow and the destruction and deaths that occurred, was something that really always broke my heart.
And so I think we have now an enormous depth of gratitude towards the Syrian people, and we need to do everything to support the Syrians in making the most of the present situation, to move in the direction of its unity, its sovereignty and within a society in which all the different components, all the different groups, can be together and all of them can be respected in their identity, but at the same time fully participating in the life of the new state.
Q: In Resolution 2790 (2025) the SC extended the mandate of Lebanon (UNIFIL), for a final time until 31 December 2026, and decided that it should start an orderly and safe drawdown and withdrawal from that date. Was this a mistake on the part of the SC, given the situation on the ground?
AG: I'm very proud of the work UNIFIL has been doing. I think they have shown enormous courage and dedication in the service of the Lebanese people and peace between Israel and Lebanon. Now, the mission will be moving into a sunset, and I think it's essential to take advantage of this period in order to make sure that the agreements that were made will be fully respected.
Israel must leave the territories that it still occupies in Lebanon and end its strikes. On the other hand, we fully support the efforts of the Lebanese government to create a monopoly on the use of force in the Lebanese army. We believe that that is an essential condition for the unity of the state and for effective governance in Lebanon, and we will also support the reforms that will be done.
We believe that with a Lebanon, whose Lebanese Armed Forces control the whole territory, and with Israel respecting the sovereignty of Lebanon and its territorial integrity, we will then have the conditions in which the role of UNIFIL will no longer be necessary.
Q: But it doesn’t look like we will get there soon…
AG: That is why it's very important to take advantage of the time that was given to us, to do our best to support this process.
Q: And you don't think that the Security Council may have made a mistake by just putting an end date on the mandate?
We will see that soon.
Q: Is there anything important you think our readers should know?
AG: The importance of supporting UNRWA. Almost 400 members of the staff of the UN have been killed in Gaza, most of them from UNRWA, many of them with their families in their houses. And the work that UNRWA has been doing has been vital for the Palestinian people. UNRWA is in an extremely difficult financial situation, and so all the solidarity that can be expressed to UNRWA is extremely important.
At the same time, I believe that the Arab world has today a growing influence in international affairs, and we move more and more into a multipolar world. And I believe that the union of the Arab world would be a very important element for the world to have more justice and more equality.
Q: Are wealthy Arab countries doing enough to support UNRWA?
AG: I hope they will rise to the challenge.
Author
Ibtisam Azem is a novelist and a journalist. She has been covering the UN for a decade. Her latest novel is The Book of Disappearance.
Global growth is projected to moderate Find GDP projections, OECD
Global growth is projected to moderate Find GDP projections, OECD
PARIS - Global GDP growth is expected to moderate from 3.2% in 2024 to 3.1% in 2025 and 3.0% in 2026, with higher trade barriers in several G20 economies and increased policy uncertainty weighing on investment and household spending.
Summary
• Global output growth remained resilient in 2024, with robust expansions in the United States and
several large emerging-market economies, including China.
• Recent activity indicators have begun to point to a softening of global growth prospects. Business
and consumer sentiment have weakened in some countries, and indicators of economic policy
uncertainty have risen markedly around the world.
• Significant changes have occurred in trade policies that if sustained would hit global growth and
raise inflation.
• Inflationary pressures continue to linger in many economies. Services inflation is still elevated, with
labour markets tight, and goods inflation is picking up from very low levels.
• Global GDP growth is projected to moderate from 3.2% in 2024, to 3.1% in 2025 and 3.0% in 2026,
with higher trade barriers in several G20 economies and increased geopolitical and policy
uncertainty weighing on investment and household spending.
• Annual GDP growth in the United States is projected to slow from its strong recent pace, to be
2.2% in 2025 and 1.6% in 2026. Euro area GDP growth is projected to be 1.0% in 2025 and 1.2%
in 2026, as heightened uncertainty keeps growth subdued. Growth in China is projected to slow
from 4.8% this year to 4.4% in 2026.
• Inflation is projected to be higher than previously expected, although still moderating as economic
growth softens. Headline inflation is projected to fall from 3.8% in 2025 to 3.2% in 2026 in the G20
economies. Core inflation is now projected to remain above central bank targets in many countries
in 2026, including the United States.
• These projections are based on an assumption that bilateral tariffs between Canada and the United
States and between Mexico and the United States are raised by an additional 25 percentage points
on almost all merchandise imports from April. Activity would be stronger and inflation lower in all
three economies if these tariff increases were lower or confined to a smaller range of goods, but
global growth would still be weaker than previously expected.
• Significant risks remain. Further fragmentation of the global economy is a key concern. Higher and
broader increases in trade barriers would hit growth around the world and add to inflation.
Higher-than-expected inflation would prompt more restrictive monetary policy and could give rise
to disruptive repricing in financial markets. On the upside, a more stable policy environment would
reduce uncertainty, and agreements that lower tariffs from current levels and more ambitious
structural policy reforms could strengthen growth. Higher government spending on defence could
also support growth in the near-term, but potentially add to longer-term fiscal pressures.
• Central banks should remain vigilant given heightened uncertainty and the potential for higher trade costs to push up wage and price pressures. Provided inflation expectations remain well anchored, and trade tensions do not intensify further, policy rate reductions should continue in economies inwhich underlying inflation is projected to moderate or remain subdued.
• Fiscal discipline is needed to ensure debt sustainability, maintain the ability for governments to
react to future shocks and accommodate current and future spending pressures.
• Countries need to find ways of addressing their concerns together within the global trading system.
Living standards would benefit from coupling these measures with efforts to strengthen the
resilience of supply chains, as well as regulatory reforms that promote dynamic product and labour
markets and policies to encourage skill upgrades.
• Faster diffusion of artificial intelligence technologies could also have significant productivity
benefits. Governments can help by ensuring the availability of high-speed digital infrastructure,
maintaining open and competitive markets and providing opportunities for workers to enhance their
skills.
To download the full report, visit: file:///Users/mac/Downloads/89af4857-en.pdf
Israel's wars on Gaza and Lebanon cost $31 billion in 2024
Israel's wars on Gaza and Lebanon cost $31 billion in 2024
JERUSALEM - Israel spent 112 billion shekels ($31 billion) on its military offensives in Gaza and Lebanon in 2024, Israel's finance ministry said in a report on Monday.
Total spending on defence in 2024 was 168.5 billion shekels, or 8.4 percent of gross domestic product, up from 98.1 billion in 2023, when defence costs were 5.2 percent of GDP, the report showed.
The increase in war spending pushed the budget deficit to 6.8 percent of GDP in 2024, a revision from a preliminary estimate of 6.9 percent. Israel's economy grew 0.9 percent in 2024.
Before the wars, in May 2023, Israeli lawmakers approved a 2024 budget of 513.7 billion shekels but the fighting required three additional budgets in 2024 that raised state spending by 21 percent to 620.6 billion shekels. Revenue last year was 484.9 billion shekels.
The deficit, which had topped eight percent of GDP during 2024, has since eased and stood at 5.3 percent in February.
Due to political infighting, Israel has yet to approve a budget for 2025 and the country is using a prorated version of the base 2024 budget.
Failure of lawmakers to pass a budget by the end of March would trigger new elections. The budget draft of tax hikes and steep spending cuts will be approved on time, said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.
"It is crucial to reduce the deficit below 5% of GDP to stabilise government expenditures and the debt-to-GDP ratio," Accountant General Yali Rothenberg said.
Earlier reports said that the Israeli ministry had not published monthly reports on war costs since January, raising concerns over transparency in government spending.
Israel's war on Gaza, described by many as a genocide, began on 7 October 2023 and ended in a ceasefire deal with Hamas on 19 January.
The offensive killed more than 61,700 Palestinians – mostly civilians – including more than 48,570 confirmed dead and others believed to still be beneath the rubble.
In Lebanon, Hezbollah began cross-border attacks on Israel in parallel to the war on Gaza in a "support front" to the Palestinians, but the hostilities escalated into a full-blown war in September before a ceasefire deal ended the conflict there on 27 November.
That war is said to have killed around 6,000 people in Lebanon. Israel has continued to carry out deadly attacks in both Lebanon and Gaza despite the ceasefire deals.
The war in Gaza and simultaneous fighting with Hezbollah have been the longest in Israel's history, and have had a significant impact on its economy.
Israel's economy is likely to remain strained in the long term, especially as military spending continues and many Israelis have not yet returned home to the north, observers say.
Tens of thousands of Galilee residents near the border with Lebanon were forced to leave their homes once clashes erupted with Hezbollah on 8 October 2023.
The Israeli government has been burdened with temporarily accommodating them in relatively safer parts of Israel.
But despite Hezbollah being battered by the war and most incapable of fighting Israel in the foreseeable future – and with a ceasefire deal that obliges it to disarm and withdraw from southern Lebanon – many north Israeli residents have refused to return home.
Ukraine world’s biggest arms importer; US dominates arms exports as Russian exports fall
Ukraine world’s biggest arms importer; US dominates arms exports as Russian exports fall
STOCKHOLM - Ukraine became the world’s largest importer of major arms in the period 2020–24, with its imports increasing nearly 100 times over compared with 2015–19. European arms imports overall grew by 155 per cent between the same periods, as states responded to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and uncertainty over the future of US foreign policy. The United States further increased its share of global arms exports to 43 per cent, while Russia’s exports fell by 64 per cent, according to new data on international arms transfers published today by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), available at www.sipri.org.
The overall volume of arms transfers globally remained at roughly the same level as in 2015–19 and 2010–14 (but was 18 per cent higher than in 2005–2009), as increasing imports in Europe and the Americas were offset by decreases in other regions. The top 10 arms exporters in 2020–24 were the same as those in 2015–19 but Russia (accounting for 7.8 per cent of global arms exports) fell to third place behind France (9.6 per cent), while Italy (4.8 per cent) jumped from 10th to sixth place.
At least 35 states sent weapons to Ukraine after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, and substantial further deliveries are in the pipeline. Ukraine received 8.8 per cent of global arms imports in 2020–24. Most of the major arms supplied to Ukraine came from the USA (45 per cent), followed by Germany (12 per cent) and Poland (11 per cent). Ukraine was the only European state among the top 10 importers in 2020–24, although many other European states significantly increased their arms imports in the period.
‘The new arms transfers figures clearly reflect the rearmament taking place among states in Europe in response to the threat from Russia,’ said Mathew George, Programme Director with the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme. ‘However, some major arms importers, including Saudi Arabia, India and China, saw large declines in import volumes for a variety of reasons, despite high threat perceptions in their regions.’
European NATO members increase dependence on US-supplied arms
Arms imports by the European NATO members more than doubled between 2015–19 and 2020–24 (+105 per cent). The USA supplied 64 per cent of these arms, a substantially larger share than in 2015–19 (52 per cent). The other main suppliers were France and South Korea (accounting for 6.5 per cent each), Germany (4.7 per cent) and Israel (3.9 per cent).
‘With an increasingly belligerent Russia and transatlantic relations under stress during the first Trump presidency, European NATO states have taken steps to reduce their dependence on arms imports and to strengthen the European arms industry,’ said Pieter Wezeman, Senior Researcher with the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme. ‘But the transatlantic arms-supply relationship has deep roots. Imports from the USA have risen and European NATO states have almost 500 combat aircraft and many other weapons still on order from the USA.’
USA further increases its share of arms exports, while Russian exports slide
Arms exports by the USA increased by 21 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24, and its share of global arms exports grew from 35 per cent to 43 per cent. The USA supplied major arms to 107 states in 2020–24.
For the first time in two decades, the largest share of US arms exports in 2020–24 went to Europe (35 per cent) rather than the Middle East (33 per cent). Nevertheless, the top single recipient of US arms was Saudi Arabia (12 per cent of US arms exports).
‘The USA is in a unique position when it comes to arms exports. At 43 per cent, its share of global arms exports is more than four times as much as the next-largest exporter, France,’ said Mathew George. ‘The USA continues to be the supplier of choice for advanced long-range strike capabilities like combat aircraft.’
In contrast to the USA, arms exports by Russia fell sharply (–64 per cent) between 2015–19 and 2020–24. The decline started before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022: in 2020 and 2021 export volumes were much smaller than in any year in the previous two decades.
‘The war against Ukraine has further accelerated the drop in Russia’s arms exports because more weapons are needed on the battlefield, trade sanctions make it harder for Russia to produce and sell its weapons, and the USA and its allies pressure states not to buy Russian arms,’ said Pieter Wezeman. ‘Two of Russia’s most important arms-trading relationships had already weakened before 2022, with India increasingly favouring other suppliers, and China sourcing more arms from its own burgeoning arms industry.’
Russia delivered major arms to 33 states in 2020–24. Two thirds of Russian arms exports went to three states: India (38 per cent), China (17 per cent) and Kazakhstan (11 per cent).
France became the world’s second largest arms supplier in 2020–24, delivering arms to 65 states. France’s exports of major arms to other European states almost trebled between 2015–19 and 2020–24 (+187 per cent). This was mainly due to deliveries of combat aircraft to Greece and Croatia, and arms supplies to Ukraine after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Nevertheless, India received by far the largest share of French arms exports (28 per cent)—almost twice the share that went to all European recipients combined (15 per cent). The second largest recipient of major arms from France was Qatar (9.7 per cent of French arms exports).
China was the fourth largest exporter of arms in 2020–24, with 5.9 per cent of global arms exports. Despite China’s efforts to increase its arms exports, many large importers do not buy Chinese arms for political reasons.
Asia and Oceania remains largest arms-importing region; China’s imports more than halve
The share of global arms transfers going to states in Asia and Oceania fell from 41 per cent to 33 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. A 21 per cent drop in imports to the region was in large part due to arms imports by China shrinking by 64 per cent between the two periods, as it increasingly substituted imports—mainly from Russia—with locally designed and produced weapon systems. China’s arms imports are likely to keep falling as the capacity of its domestic arms industry grows.
Four states in Asia and Oceania ranked among the 10 largest arms importers globally in 2020–24: India, Pakistan, Japan and Australia. China dropped out of the top 10 arms importers for the first time since 1990–94. The main suppliers to the region in 2020–24 were the USA, which accounted for 37 per cent of regional arms imports, Russia (17 per cent) and China (14 per cent).
India was the world’s second largest arms importer, with its imports reflecting perceived threats from both China and Pakistan. However, its imports decreased by 9.3 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. The largest share of Indian arms imports (36 per cent) came from Russia, a significantly smaller share than in 2015–19 (55 per cent) and 2010–14 (72 per cent). Arms imports by Pakistan grew by 61 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. China became even more dominant as its supplier, accounting for 81 per cent of Pakistan’s arms imports in 2020–24, compared with 74 per cent in 2015–19.
With the sharp drop in China’s arms imports, and marked decreases in imports by Taiwan (–27 per cent) and South Korea (–24 per cent), arms imports by East Asian states shrank by 22 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. Japan (+93 per cent) was the only East Asian state that saw an increase in its arms imports.
‘While arms imports to Europe and the Middle East continue to grab media attention, Asia and Oceania remained the largest arms-importing region in the world in 2020–24, as it has been almost invariably since the early 1990s,’ said Siemon Wezeman, Senior Researcher with the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme. ‘Threat perceptions concerning China are behind much of the arms procurement in the region.’
Middle East arms imports dip
Arms imports by states in the Middle East fell by 20 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. Four of the top 10 global importers in 2020–24 were in the Middle East: Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Kuwait. Qatar was the world’s third largest arms importer in 2020–24 (up from 10th largest in 2015–19). Between 2015–19 and 2020–24, Saudi Arabia’s arms imports decreased by 41 per cent.
More than half of arms imports to the Middle East came from the USA (52 per cent), while 13 per cent came from Italy, 9.8 per cent from France and 7.6 per cent from Germany.
‘Regional conflicts and tensions continue to drive demand for arms imports in the Middle East,’ said Zain Hussain, Researcher with the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme. ‘Given the volume of pending deliveries, the Middle East will remain a major arms-importing region.’
Despite the ongoing war in Gaza, arms imports by Israel remained largely stable between 2015–19 and 2020–24. In 2020–24 the USA supplied the biggest share of Israel’s arms imports (66 per cent), followed by Germany (33 per cent) and Italy (1.0 per cent). Israel was the 15th largest arms importer globally in 2020–24, down from 14th in 2015–19.
‘Israel has received substantial military aid from the USA following the Hamas-led attack on 7 October 2023,’ said Zain Hussain. ‘However, for its recent military operations, Israel has employed mainly US-supplied weapons it had received earlier. Israel’s adversaries Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis have relied on Iranian arms, and Hezbollah and the Houthis have used Iranian-supplied missiles and drones against Israel.’
Insecurity and conflict drive large increase in arms imports to West Africa
Arms transfers to West Africa have been rising sharply in the past 15 years as the security situation has deteriorated. The combined arms imports of West African states almost doubled (+82 per cent) between 2010–14 and 2020–24. Nigeria accounted for by far the biggest share (34 per cent) of arms imports to West Africa in 2020–24.
‘The growth in arms imports to West Africa has been striking. While the volume of imports remains relatively small, it has important geopolitical implications,’ said Katarina Djokic, Researcher with the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme. ‘States like Burkina Faso, Mali and Senegal seem to be rapidly increasing their imports. Arms suppliers are using arms exports to boost their influence in this part of the world, including emerging suppliers—primarily Türkiye—alongside more established actors such as China, France, Russia and the USA.’
Other notable developments
- African arms imports fell by 44 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24. This was mainly due to large decreases in imports by Algeria (–73 per cent) and Morocco (–26 per cent). Arms imports by states in sub-Saharan Africa increased by 4.2 per cent.
- Combat aircraft are the main long-range strike weapon imported by states, but interest in long-range land-attack missiles is increasing. In 2020–24 the USA supplied 45 per cent of global long-range land-attack missile exports, delivering them to 7 states, with deliveries to 13 states pending.
- Arms imports by states in the Americas increased by 13 per cent. The USA was the biggest importer in the region (accounting for 3.1 per cent of global arms imports and 50 per cent of imports by states in the Americas).
- Brazil’s arms imports increased by 77 per cent between 2015–19 and 2020–24, and accounted for 49 per cent of all arms imports to South America in 2020–24. The main suppliers to South America in 2020–24 were France (accounting for 30 per cent of South American arms imports), the USA (12 per cent) and the UK (11 per cent).
- North Korea exported artillery and missiles to Russia for use in Ukraine. With this, both states violated the United Nations sanctions on North Korea.
Page 5 of 63
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Main News
latest news
- Sensational, unverifiable, rightwing politics dominates young adults social media feeds, researchers
- Stunned, sidelined and disunited: the EU response to Iran war
- Nuclear-armed fanatics began the Iran war. It's not the mullahs
- Weapons Washington is using in its war on Iran?
- Global arms flows jump nearly 10 per cent as European demand soars
North Africa
Research Papers & Reports
Africa
Navigating Financial Gateways and Security in Interactive Gaming
The intricate architecture of the modern interactive gambling ecosystem requires consumers to possess a highly analytical mindset, particularly regarding financial logistics and digital security. Gone are the days when a flashy banner advertisement and a rudimentary software interface were sufficient to attract and retain a dedicated audience. Today's most successful digital portals are complex, highly regulated financial and entertainment ecosystems that must seamlessly balance the adrenaline of high-stakes gaming with impenetrable digital security and flawless operational logistics. For a platform to truly excel in this fiercely competitive environment, it must offer a holistic package: verified mathematical fairness, remarkably rapid transaction speeds, and a banking infrastructure that provides absolute peace of mind. It is within this refined context that discerning players must evaluate their options, examining the foundational integrity of the operation's cashier system.
When discussing platforms that prioritize exceptional security and regulatory redundancy, Royalistplay instantly comes to the forefront. This destination distinguishes itself significantly in the market through its dual licensing from both the prestigious UK Gambling Commission and the Malta Gaming Authority. This exceptional level of regulatory oversight demonstrates a profound, serious commitment to legal compliance and player protection that sets Royalistplay apart from many standard competitors. The platform backs up this security with a highly balanced welcome package offering a 100% match up to €300 alongside a notably generous allocation of 200 free spins. Their curated selection of over 2,500 games covers all major categories, with a particular strength in progressive jackpot slots where potentially life-changing sums accumulate. Most importantly, Royalistplay processes withdrawals with remarkable efficiency, particularly for e-wallet users whose cashouts are typically completed within a rapid 12 to 24-hour window.
Speaking of highly successful hybrid integration, Winamax perfectly exemplifies exactly how to successfully merge two massive, highly distinct entertainment sectors into one cohesive, secure platform. Originally celebrated primarily across continental Europe for its massive peer-to-peer poker networks and highly comprehensive sports wagering markets, Winamax has steadily evolved to include a highly polished, robust interactive casino section featuring over 1,500 meticulously selected titles. This destination is incredibly attractive to versatile consumers who deeply enjoy alternating between sports wagering and engaging with digital amusements. Their unique promotional structure perfectly reflects this dual focus, frequently offering €100 in free bets alongside 50 free spins. Holding a strict MGA license, Winamax is globally renowned for its deeply reliable, rapid payment processing and possesses one of the most technologically advanced, flawlessly stable mobile applications available on the market.
Understanding the logistical efficiency of financial transactions remains the absolute most critical metric by which active, serious users judge a platform's overall, real-world quality. A massive portfolio of entertaining software is entirely negated if an operator actively stalls or deliberately complicates the withdrawal process.
- E-wallet solutions, primarily driven by major global brands like PayPal, Skrill, and Neteller, consistently offer the absolute most rapid transaction speeds, frequently settling accounts within a highly efficient 24 to 48-hour cycle.
- Traditional credit and debit cards, like Visa and Mastercard, provide familiar, instant deposits, but subsequent withdrawals can take anywhere from 3 to 5 business days to fully process through the banking networks.
- Direct bank transfers offer incredibly high security and are ideal for moving massive sums of money without third-party involvement, though they typically suffer from the longest processing times, sometimes requiring up to 7 business days.
- Instant banking solutions, such as Trustly, effectively bridge the gap by connecting directly to your bank account while facilitating near-instantaneous withdrawals at supported platforms.
- Prepaid vouchers like Paysafecard offer incredible, unparalleled security and strict budget control for initial deposits, ensuring your banking details are never shared online.
The bedrock of any secure digital wagering experience is the flawless implementation of impenetrable cryptographic security. When sensitive personal data and financial information are transmitted from a personal device to the operator's remote servers, they must be shielded by military-grade protocols. Modern consumers must be highly vigilant in ensuring their chosen platform adheres strictly to these technical standards. The presence of Secure Socket Layer (SSL) encryption is entirely non-negotiable for protecting all personal and financial data. Furthermore, players must be aware of the KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures. All legitimate platforms are legally bound to verify a player's identity before releasing funds. Submitting high-quality scans of a passport, a recent utility bill, and proof of payment method is a standard anti-money laundering practice. Completing this step proactively ensures that your withdrawal requests are processed without frustrating administrative delays.
Customer support infrastructure represents another incredibly critical pillar of a premium entertainment hub. Even the absolute most technologically advanced, perfectly coded platforms will occasionally encounter unpredictable software glitches or highly complex financial routing anomalies. When a user's hard-earned capital is actively in transit, the ability to immediately contact a highly knowledgeable human representative is paramount. Top-tier operations invest heavily in their support centers, offering completely uninterrupted, round-the-clock live chat services staffed by highly trained agents who possess the actual administrative authority to manually investigate and resolve complex account issues in real-time. This level of immediate accessibility provides a profound psychological safety net.
From a legal and financial standpoint, players should also be intimately aware of the specific tax implications surrounding their potential winnings. In many highly favorable jurisdictions, such as Ireland, profits derived from recreational interactive wagering are legally classified as tax-exempt. This incredible benefit means the individual retains the full mathematical value of their success without obligatory declarations to national revenue services, maximizing the value of every winning session. However, it is crucial to remember that while winnings are tax-free, gambling losses are not tax-deductible. This favorable tax status is a massive advantage when selecting a premier casino online ireland platform, but it underscores the importance of playing responsibly, as professional gamblers may face different taxation rules.
Francais
Élections 2026 en Afrique : Naviguer dans la complexité pour répondre aux attentes des citoyens
Centrafrique : après les élections, consolider les gains sécuritaires
Dix tendances en matière de sécurité en Afrique en 2025 en graphiques
Centrafrique : les Zandé tiraillés entre armée, milice et troupes russes
Advanced Strategies for Evaluating Interactive Entertainment Platforms
The contemporary digital amusement landscape offers an incredibly diverse array of platforms specifically engineered to provide thrilling, high-stakes entertainment directly to personal devices. As technological capabilities have expanded exponentially, so too has the sophistication of these interactive wagering hubs. Today's enthusiasts are presented with options that range from heavily gamified adventure portals to colossal, encyclopedic libraries containing thousands of distinct interactive titles. The pursuit of identifying a premier destination requires looking past superficial marketing campaigns and thoroughly analyzing the foundational technology, the diversity of the software portfolios, and the strictness of their regulatory adherence. By understanding the unique value propositions of different operators, consumers can accurately align their personal preferences with the optimal digital environment.
For individuals whose primary criterion is sheer volume and unparalleled variety, Myriad stands out as a titan within the industry. True to its descriptive name, this destination boasts a staggering library exceeding 4,000 individual titles. This colossal portfolio is meticulously curated through strategic partnerships with over sixty independent software developers, guaranteeing an incredibly diverse spectrum of mathematical models, artistic themes, and gameplay mechanics. While Myriad operates under a Curacao license—a regulatory framework often considered slightly less rigorous than its European counterparts—the platform has successfully maintained an impeccable track record regarding fairness and financial reliability. Their introductory offer provides substantial additional capital for new registrants, allowing them to thoroughly explore this massive ecosystem. This environment is particularly suited for explorers who tire quickly of repetitive mechanics and constantly seek out fresh, innovative releases.
Conversely, some platforms seek to innovate not through sheer volume, but by completely reimagining the user experience through profound gamification. Duelz represents a paradigm shift in how interactive entertainment is delivered. Rather than presenting a static grid of titles, Duelz immerses its users in a dynamic, fantasy-themed adventure where they must develop personalized avatars, complete daily quests, and engage in direct, competitive duels against other human players to secure exclusive rewards. This highly engaging approach appeals strongly to a modern demographic that expects deeper interactivity from their digital platforms. Despite this playful exterior, Duelz maintains incredibly strict operational standards, holding dual licenses from the highly respected MGA and the Swedish Gaming Authority. Furthermore, their integration of advanced financial gateways like Trustly allows for lightning-fast withdrawals that frequently process in mere minutes.
When evaluating the vast libraries offered by these platforms, it is helpful to categorize the available entertainment to understand where a specific site excels. A diverse portfolio is the hallmark of the best online casino ireland has to offer today.
- Video Slots: These range from high-volatility, feature-dense games offering massive potential multipliers to low-volatility titles providing steady, smaller returns.
- Live Dealer Suites: Utilizing high-definition broadcasting to beam professional croupiers directly to screens, offering an authentic, social atmosphere.
- Traditional Table Games: Software-driven versions of classic card and wheel games that utilize certified random number generators for immediate, fast-paced results.
- Hybrid Integration: Platforms that seamlessly combine traditional digital games with comprehensive sports betting interfaces within a single account.
- Progressive Jackpots: Networked titles where a fraction of every global wager contributes to a continuously growing, potentially life-altering prize pool.
Speaking of hybrid integration, Winamax perfectly exemplifies how to successfully merge two massive entertainment sectors. Originally celebrated across continental Europe for its peer-to-peer poker networks and comprehensive sports wagering markets, Winamax has evolved to include a highly polished, robust interactive gaming section. Featuring over 1,500 meticulously selected titles, this destination is incredibly attractive to versatile consumers who enjoy alternating between analyzing sporting events and engaging with traditional digital amusements. Their promotional structure reflects this dual focus, frequently offering a combination of complimentary sports bets alongside spins for their software library. Winamax is also renowned for possessing one of the most technologically advanced and stable mobile applications available, ensuring a flawless experience regardless of the user's physical location.
The bedrock of any secure digital wagering experience is the implementation of impenetrable cryptographic security and the continuous validation of mathematical fairness. When data is transmitted from a personal device to the operator's servers, it must be shielded by advanced protocols. Modern consumers must be highly vigilant in ensuring their chosen platform adheres to strict technical standards. Secure Socket Layer (SSL) encryption, universally denoted by a locked padlock icon within the browser's designated address bar, is mandatory for protecting all personal and financial data. Furthermore, visible certification seals from highly respected, independent auditing laboratories, such as eCOGRA, iTech Labs, or GLI, prove the integrity of the random number generators used in the games.
The logistical efficiency of financial transactions remains the most critical metric by which active users judge a platform's overall quality. A massive portfolio of entertaining software is entirely negated if an operator actively stalls or complicates the withdrawal process. An exceptional digital destination will support a highly diverse array of financial gateways to accommodate all preferences. E-wallet solutions consistently offer the most rapid transaction speeds. Traditional banking methods, while inherently secure and universally trusted, rely on older infrastructural networks that can delay receipt of funds by three to seven business days. Progressive platforms are also increasingly integrating direct banking services, which effectively bridges the gap, offering the security of a direct bank connection with the speed of a modern digital wallet.
Customer support infrastructure represents another critical, yet frequently overlooked, pillar of a premium entertainment hub. Even the most technologically advanced platforms will occasionally encounter software glitches or financial routing anomalies. When a user's capital is actively in transit, the ability to immediately contact a knowledgeable human representative is paramount. Top-tier operations invest heavily in their support centers, offering uninterrupted, round-the-clock live chat services staffed by highly trained agents who possess the administrative authority to manually investigate and resolve complex account issues. This level of immediate accessibility provides a profound psychological safety net.
Another crucial element of player protection is understanding the terms and conditions tied to promotional offers. Wagering requirements dictate how many times a bonus amount must be played through before it converts into withdrawable cash. A platform might offer a massive 200% match, but if the wagering requirement is set at an unreasonable 50x or 60x, the statistical probability of converting that bonus is incredibly low. Educated players look for platforms that balance generous matches with fair, achievable wagering limits, usually sitting comfortably between the 25x and 35x mark. Additionally, checking for game contribution weights is vital, as slots usually contribute 100% to these requirements, while table games may only contribute 10%.
Ultimately, engaging with digital wagering must be viewed through the lens of responsible recreation. The inherent mathematical realities dictate that the operator will systematically secure a profit over an extended timeline. Recognizing this fundamental truth allows individuals to engage with the software purely for its entertainment value. By proactively utilizing reality checks, establishing strict financial deposit ceilings, and strictly adhering to predetermined session lengths, enthusiasts can ensure their participation remains a thrilling, positive addition to their leisure activities, completely safeguarded against the potential pitfalls of unregulated behavior.




























































































































































